Blockchain clients
Overlay reliability under churn, partitions, and adversarial conditions.
Non-confidential evaluation
Constraint driven overlay resilience evaluation for churn and adversarial conditions
Non-confidential by default. Scoped evaluation, reproducibility focus, decision report. NDA available upon request.
Non-confidentialNDA availableReproducibility focusDecision report
DePIN
Topology churn, tail behavior, and operational safety within constraints.
P2P data layers
Robustness under biased routing state and isolation pressure, evaluated defensively.
- Decision report, pass, conditional pass, no-go
- Repro steps (where applicable), configs, and run notes
- Risk findings, scoped to the agreed threat model
- Prioritized mitigations, framed as evaluation actions and next steps
- Giant component under churn
- Eclipse susceptibility proxy
- Recovery time after partition
- Mixing or propagation proxy
- Tail behavior under targeted removal
Overlay resilience evaluation
- Churn and recovery, bounded by constraints
- Attack oriented evaluation, defensive only
- Decision report with distributions
Datacenter graph robustness evaluation
- Failures and tail behavior under comparable regimes
- Operational safety, budgets, rollback expectations
- Decision report with limitations and variability posture
Step 1Scope
One scenario, constraints, primary KPI, and a non-confidential baseline description.
Step 2Run
Time boxed runs with comparable regimes and stress suites, defensively scoped.
Step 3Report
Decision report with distributions, worst-case runs, limitations, and next steps.
Typical timeline
- 48 hours, scope alignment
- 5 business days, runs and analysis
- 48 hours, report delivery
Paid evaluations typically start at a low five figure budget, scope dependent.